ad6eb7a9a6
Some checks failed
Policy: internal VLANs reach each other and the internet; the internet initiates nothing inward. That was already the effect of the IPv4 ruleset, but built as a blacklist -- default-action accept plus explicit drops per WAN interface. Identical behaviour right up until a WAN is added, at which point it is open and nothing looks wrong. This expresses it as a whitelist. Two findings from the sim, both of which would have been outages in production: `set` on a rule number is ADDITIVE. The sim already had a rule 10 carrying inbound/outbound interface constraints; `set ... rule 10 state established` ANDed onto it, producing a stateful-accept that applied to one interface pair only. Return traffic from the internet then matched no rule and hit the default drop, so LAN hosts could reach nothing outbound. The generator now deletes each filter before rebuilding it, so the code owns the subtree. It is one commit, so nftables is rebuilt atomically -- there is no window without a firewall. DHCP lease renewal is unicast UDP to port 68 and conntrack does not reliably cover it. Without an explicit rule the WAN keeps working until the lease expires and then dies -- a delayed failure that looks nothing like a firewall change. Also added a loopback accept for both families, absent from the v6 policy since it went default-deny. Verified in labsim: inter-VLAN ok, LAN-to-internet ok, internet-to-router dropped, and internet-to-LAN dropped with the drop counter incrementing by exactly the packets sent, after routing the test through the router rather than around it via the hypervisor. Also extends the drift check to the firewall subtree, which it did not cover -- so it had been reporting "in sync" while that subtree was uncaptured. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DMVzWZgiKW2wquf5z8S1yH
3.0 KiB
Executable File
3.0 KiB
Executable File