fix(gate): stop masking backend errors + rescue thinking-model prompt selection
Some checks failed
CI/CD / lint (pull_request) Successful in 1m6s
CI/CD / typecheck (pull_request) Successful in 2m14s
CI/CD / test (pull_request) Successful in 1m22s
CI/CD / smoke (pull_request) Failing after 1m54s
CI/CD / build (pull_request) Successful in 4m17s
CI/CD / publish (pull_request) Has been skipped

Two independent, live-reproduced causes of "Smart prompt-selection unavailable
(LLM response did not contain valid selection JSON)" in the gate:

- Cause B (openai.ts request): the response handler JSON.parsed the body with no
  res.statusCode check, so a LiteLLM/vLLM HTTP 500 ("Connection error") parsed as
  an empty completion and surfaced as generic "bad JSON", masking backend-down.
  Now reject on status >= 400 with "OpenAI HTTP <status>: <body>" so the selector
  reports the true degradedReason.
- Cause A (parseResponse + selector budget): a reasoning model (qwen3-thinking)
  spends its whole 1024-token budget in reasoning_content and emits content=null,
  so the {selectedNames} JSON never appears. parseResponse now falls back to
  reasoning_content (incl. provider_specific_fields) when content is empty, and
  the selector budget is raised 1024 -> 4000 (env MCPCTL_GATE_SELECT_MAX_TOKENS)
  so thinking + the JSON answer both fit.

Note: mcpd's chat path got a reasoning_content fallback in PR #67; this is the
separate mcplocal gate-selection provider, which never did. Tests: openai-provider
(500 rejects, reasoning_content capture/preference). mcplocal suite green (749).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michal
2026-07-23 22:10:08 +01:00
parent f614e9bb98
commit 9dbd2f175d
3 changed files with 110 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
/**
* OpenAiProvider — transport-error surfacing and reasoning_content capture.
*
* Covers the two gate prompt-ranking failure modes reproduced live 2026-07-23:
* - a LiteLLM/vLLM HTTP 500 must reject (not parse as an empty completion),
* - a reasoning ("thinking") model that emits its answer under
* reasoning_content with content=null must still yield that text.
*/
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest';
let mockStatus = 200;
let mockBody = '{}';
vi.mock('node:http', () => {
const request = vi.fn((_opts: unknown, cb?: unknown) => {
const res = {
statusCode: mockStatus,
on: (event: string, handler: (d?: unknown) => void) => {
if (event === 'data') handler(Buffer.from(mockBody));
if (event === 'end') handler();
return res;
},
};
if (typeof cb === 'function') (cb as (r: unknown) => void)(res);
return { on: vi.fn().mockReturnThis(), write: vi.fn(), end: vi.fn() };
});
return { default: { request }, request };
});
const { OpenAiProvider } = await import('../src/providers/openai.js');
function provider(): InstanceType<typeof OpenAiProvider> {
return new OpenAiProvider({ apiKey: 'k', baseUrl: 'http://localhost:9' });
}
describe('OpenAiProvider transport + reasoning handling', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
mockStatus = 200;
mockBody = '{}';
});
it('rejects on HTTP >= 400 with the status + body (not a masked empty completion)', async () => {
mockStatus = 500;
mockBody = JSON.stringify({ error: { message: 'litellm.InternalServerError: Connection error' } });
await expect(
provider().complete({ messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hi' }], maxTokens: 8 }),
).rejects.toThrow(/OpenAI HTTP 500/);
});
it('falls back to reasoning_content when content is null (thinking model)', async () => {
mockBody = JSON.stringify({
choices: [{ message: { content: null, reasoning_content: '{"selectedNames":["x"]}' }, finish_reason: 'length' }],
});
const r = await provider().complete({ messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hi' }], maxTokens: 8 });
expect(r.content).toContain('selectedNames');
expect(r.finishReason).toBe('length');
});
it('reads reasoning_content from provider_specific_fields too', async () => {
mockBody = JSON.stringify({
choices: [{ message: { content: '', provider_specific_fields: { reasoning_content: 'thought-answer' } } }],
});
const r = await provider().complete({ messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hi' }], maxTokens: 8 });
expect(r.content).toBe('thought-answer');
});
it('prefers real content over reasoning_content when both are present', async () => {
mockBody = JSON.stringify({
choices: [{ message: { content: 'real', reasoning_content: 'thinking' }, finish_reason: 'stop' }],
});
const r = await provider().complete({ messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hi' }], maxTokens: 8 });
expect(r.content).toBe('real');
});
});